Go Back    Forum > Digital Photography > Photo Cameras: Buying & Shooting

LinkBack Thread Tools
10-28-2010, 10:18 PM
Sossity Sossity is offline
Premium Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 434
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I was reading a review about the Nikon d7000 on amazon, & one of the reviews mention these newer cameras, where there is not mirror box so the camera body is smaller.

As I have mentioned I will be using the camera for general photography, & low light, & artwork.

are these cameras as good as a traditional DSLR? would it be as good in quality (build & image quality) as the Nikon DSLR's & the d7000?

If a micro 4/3 would be as good, are there some models I could consider?

I know I am flooding this forum with questions, but I am a bit new to DSLR's, have a budget, & want to get something that will last me awhile.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
10-28-2010, 10:47 PM
kpmedia's Avatar
kpmedia kpmedia is offline
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,314
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
You'll need to remember that many (most?) online user reviews are left by idiots that know less than you do. Or at best, as much as you do. This sounds like one of those instances. These are the same people who cannot set the clock on a VCR and complain about it (blaming the VCR) -- or praise a product because it has a pretty remote (nevermind that the device works horribly).

Not having a mirror box would mean there is not an optical viewfinder. There is clearly an optical viewfinder, so that's just a bunch of crazy hogwash that you read. There's obviously a mirror in the body, based on the Nikon engineering photos shown on Amazon:


Other images show an obvious pentaprism used in viewfinders.

LCDs are hard to see in most light anyway, and real photographers quite honestly should not spend much time playing in playback mode or menus. Take the photos, use your skills, and edit later. I only check an LCD for exposure quality before I get to serious shooting, or when I need to check if I have enough good shots when several assignments are back to back. (In the old days, you'd just gamble and pray you got enough as you run from one event to another in the same day!)

Looking at the LCD in sunlight (any outdoor light, to be honest) or even a well-lit indoor location is an exercise in futility, even with those special "shade" type (horse blinder style) LCD covers.

LCD-only view cameras make for a miserable experience.

A lot of consumer cameras now come with that fold-out LCD gimmick, but Nikon seems to (so far) be ignoring it in favor of more proven and sensible photo methods.

The 4x3 cameras are not as good as the standard 3x2 cameras, no. While the four-thirds system is fine for what it is, I don't see it as having any benefits to your situation. You'd be buying into a far more obscure setup.

More on the 4:3 system at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Thirds_system if you're curious.

I'd stick to Nikon v Canon for your purchasing.
Sometimes I'll even suggest Sony or Pentax DSLR cameras, but this isn't one of those times.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter

- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon D7000 is it just a one time make or edtion or will there be more to come? Sossity Photo Cameras: Buying & Shooting 6 10-28-2010 11:47 PM
Panasonic AG-1980 as good as JVC S-VHS VCR ? ramrod Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 1 11-13-2009 07:33 PM
Panasonic NVSV121EBS any good? manthing Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 8 07-12-2005 06:07 PM

Thread Tools

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM