01-05-2016, 08:14 AM
|
|
Site Staff | Web Development
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 654 Times in 457 Posts
|
|
Which version of IE? Let me know.
IE is less than 7% of all web traffic: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
In the past 30 days, our traffic has closely matched this, only slightly higher at 8%. Of that 8%, 83% was using IE11, 8% has IE10, 5% has IE9, and 4% IE8 and under. In other words, it's such a tiny % that we can't worry about it. The other 90%+ of visitors are what we focus on. IE is a terrible browser, and should be replaced with Firefox or Chrome.
This site works best with Mozilla (Firefox, Seamonkey, Pale Moon, etc). Chrome is fine, but has no forum WYSIWYG (and is the fault of Chrome not fully supporting AJAX).
- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Ads / Sponsors
|
|
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
01-05-2016, 11:32 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 336 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by latreche34
So are there any encoders out there that keep 4:2:2 of the footage captured after encoding to a playable format since neither DV nor MPEG2 keeps it?
|
MPEG-2 and AVC support 4:2:2, but the real trouble is that hardware players do not.
And besides:
Quote:
is it worth it for the quality of an analogue video such as VHS/S-VHS/Video8/Hi8/Betamax/S-Betamax ?
|
Likely not. From what I've seen, the vertical resolution isn't there on the consumer tape formats. I only brought up 4:2:2 because you had.
Quote:
Can I pull the uncompressed video using Edirol VMC-1 with firewire port?
|
No. It only sends a pre-compressed stream out.
|
01-05-2016, 02:29 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,320
Thanked 545 Times in 503 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by admin
Which version of IE? Let me know.
IE is less than 7% of all web traffic: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
In the past 30 days, our traffic has closely matched this, only slightly higher at 8%. Of that 8%, 83% was using IE11, 8% has IE10, 5% has IE9, and 4% IE8 and under. In other words, it's such a tiny % that we can't worry about it. The other 90%+ of visitors are what we focus on. IE is a terrible browser, and should be replaced with Firefox or Chrome.
This site works best with Mozilla (Firefox, Seamonkey, Pale Moon, etc). Chrome is fine, but has no forum WYSIWYG (and is the fault of Chrome not fully supporting AJAX).
|
I use IE11, I do have firefox and chrome, I just got use to IE, I've been using it since the 90's at home, I believe the raison why chrome has the highest # is because of the android devices and there is a lot of them, even apple devices owners prefer to use chrome over safari, firfeox app is not free that's probably why it has a low #, at work we use IE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan
MPEG-2 and AVC support 4:2:2, but the real trouble is that hardware players do not.
|
There are several variations of MPEG-2 which one you are referring to? I had a MPEG-2 SD capture box and it only does 4:2:0.
|
01-06-2016, 07:19 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 336 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by latreche34
There are several variations of MPEG-2 which one you are referring to? I had a MPEG-2 SD capture box and it only does 4:2:0.
|
High Profile and 4:2:2 Profile. As far as hardware encoders go, these are broadcast-level. Software encoders offer the option.
|
01-07-2016, 02:28 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,320
Thanked 545 Times in 503 Posts
|
|
I see, MPEG-2 part 2, Thanks msgohan for the valuable information, also big thanks to lordsmurf for his work, a pleasure to learn from you.
|
01-07-2016, 06:58 AM
|
|
Remembered
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 453
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
Quote:
High Profile and 4:2:2 Profile. As far as hardware encoders go, these are broadcast-level. Software encoders offer the option.
|
is korrekt,see screen
automatisch
422@ML
422@HL
Quote:
I see, MPEG-2 part 2, Thanks msgohan for the valuable information, also big thanks to lordsmurf for his work, a pleasure to learn from you.
|
lord smurf has here written anything but.
but users msgohan
but yes we can learn from both
|
01-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 336 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by latreche34
I see, MPEG-2 part 2
|
I think you misunderstand. The profiles that I mentioned are the "variations" of MPEG-2 that support 4:2:2. Part 2 wasn't the answer to your question, because all MPEG-2 video is "Part 2". The other "Parts" cover container and audio formats only.
|
01-08-2016, 11:38 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,320
Thanked 545 Times in 503 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldwingfahrer
lord smurf has here written anything but.
but users msgohan
but yes we can learn from both
|
I don't mean this thread, the whole website.
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan
I think you misunderstand. The profiles that I mentioned are the "variations" of MPEG-2 that support 4:2:2. Part 2 wasn't the answer to your question, because all MPEG-2 video is "Part 2". The other "Parts" cover container and audio formats only.
|
Thanks for the clarification
|
01-09-2016, 10:38 AM
|
|
Site Staff | Video
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,683
Thanked 2,467 Times in 2,098 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan
The profiles that I mentioned are the "variations" of MPEG-2 that support 4:2:2.
|
Like so:
mc-mpeg2-profile1.jpg
You must be logged in to view this content; either login or register for the forum. The attached screen shots, before/after images, photos and graphics are created/posted for the benefit of site members. And you are invited to join our digital media community. |
|
01-31-2016, 11:41 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,320
Thanked 545 Times in 503 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by latreche34
There is no attachment button in advanced mode, let me try another browser.
-- merged --
Wow cannot believe that internet explorer was the problem, here is a screen shot on how the page looked like: (see attached)
Anyway, here is a NTSC VHS tape that I captured with Edirol VMC-1 using adobe premiere capture wizard for demonstration purposes only, I didn't like the outcome although the tape is not in good quality, what do you guys think?, PAL captures were a lot better:
Forgot to mention that the VHS deck is Toshiba V-E61A nothing fancy.
|
I did a test capture from my new JVC HR-S7600AM S-VHS deck with S-Video cable using VMC-1 via firewire and captured the same segment on the same tape again I just trimmed losselessly using SolveigMM Video Splitter to make a small file, The difference was huge compared to the one above that was done using Toshiba V-E61A VHS only deck, TBC is ON on both VCR and VMC-1.
|
02-01-2016, 10:31 AM
|
|
Remembered
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 453
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
Hello
Cutting works well with VDub "Direct Stream Copy"
open your movie times in VDub
Picture Frame = 96 see screen
Useless for further processing
Original is probably in single images in 15 or of 18 fps progressive ...
I have no such source material
-------------------------
You may be here to find the solution for "anime"
http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/3...-in-Virtualdub
Last edited by Goldwingfahrer; 02-01-2016 at 10:45 AM.
|
02-01-2016, 11:29 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 336 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
The biggest difference I see is that the new capture doesn't have the blown-out levels like the other one. I wonder if you could redo the capture from the previous VCR but use the VMC-1 Proc Amp controls to bring the levels into proper range.
|
02-01-2016, 03:31 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 336 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
I also meant to ask:
Are you using 32kHz audio intentionally?
[Please merge with my previous post. I can't edit it now.]
|
02-02-2016, 02:56 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,320
Thanked 545 Times in 503 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan
The biggest difference I see is that the new capture doesn't have the blown-out levels like the other one. I wonder if you could redo the capture from the previous VCR but use the VMC-1 Proc Amp controls to bring the levels into proper range.
|
I used the same setting for both caps, I disconnected the VHS deck it's going to be sold pretty soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan
I also meant to ask:
Are you using 32kHz audio intentionally?
[Please merge with my previous post. I can't edit it now.]
|
I don't know why it was captured at 32Khz, I used virtualdub, I need to figure that out.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM
|