A little back story... So far I've captured about 13 family VHS tapes from 1984-1989 using a DVC110 and GV-D1000 (as a firewire bridge, and simultaneously archiving onto miniDV). When I was trying to figure out if the GV did TBC, I found a thread here about loosing a ton of color information in the DV compression. This ruined my satisfaction with what I had already done. Thanks a lot guys!
I did these 13 tapes before my father died so that he could watch them on in his hospital bed while dieing, and after he did I stopped. 4 years later I'm trying to finish the job! (And very likely recapture those 13 tapes!)
It is hard for me to believe that these stone age ATI cards are the best but with all I've read here I must! I'm pretty sure I still have my AIW 128/128Pro at my Mom's house, but I could have sold it on eBay 15 years ago and forgot.
It was a knee jerk reaction of mine to not consider lossless uncompressed video as a possibility when starting this process. I thought I was doing a "good" job with my DV codec.
My video editing/capture experience until transferring these family videos was based on my old G3 with a huge 5GB hard drive, and later on the ATI AIW128 with a very expensive 160GB hard drive. Uncompressed video wasn't a thing that I could consider! Since they are MY family videos I want the best results possible. I'm also planning on making new videos with a vidicon tube camera for a youtube vlog and want the quality for that as well. I ran the numbers through a bitrate calculator, and was surprised to consider that 240GB/hr isn't that much.
While money is important to me, I don't want to save money on this process where a little extra here and there will make a big difference.
Lordsmurf wrote here:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...html#post20761
...and I checked the ATI AIW card model list:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...html#post13441
That he preferred the 7200 and 7500. Does anyone think the 8500, which also uses the same chipset, should be equal to his preference?
In that second link it is mentioned that the 200 chipset refined the quality of the video, but in other posts the 9000 series wasn't recommended because of the possible addition of noise. Should I start buying 9000 cards until I get one that doesn't have noise???
If lordsmurf reads this, I'd love to get some clarification on the 200 chipset being better vs a preference for the 7200/7500 (and maybe also 8500?
Is there any chance I can use Windows 7? I found a few places where people had mixed experiences... I have a PCIe flash drive I'd like to use, as well as >1GbE.
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...er-9600xt.html
I'm sorry if these questions have been covered. I really have tried to figure out which card was the perfect one for me.