Quote:
Originally Posted by bee_doc
and I have the camcorder (Panasonic NZ-R1) which has composite video/audio output only (yellow and white phonos)
|
Camcorders rarely had good playback. We'd need to see a sample.
In fact, ironically, VHS-C cameras tended to eat VHS-C tapes on playback more than VCRs did. If a tapes gets stuck in VHS-C camera, you're in for a bad experience. It's not as easy as the VCR with proper powered adapter (CP7U type)..
Quote:
I want to find the best (and low cost) option
|
"best" and "low cost" rarely touch. What's the realistic budget for the gear? (And remember, buy it, use it, resell it. Good video capture gear holds value, some even increase in value.)
Quote:
to capture these tapes to a digital format for posterity and viewing (I presume an MPEG format).
|
MPEG, maybe. Capture and final viewing formats not the same. MPEG can retain interlace, whcih you want for TV viewing.
Quote:
Mac support. Ideally the device would work and have software for Mac (OSX) and Windows so that I can establish a process that he can then follow to capture all of his tapes
|
Have you considered Bootcamp, boot into WinXP/Win7? That gives some more options.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookemdano
you stated that the videotapes are "very valuable", but you also said that you're using a low-end camcorder with only composite output.
So I think you and your friend need to determine just *how* valuable the footage is. Is it valuable just in that you want to digitize it with the cheapest tools possible? Or is it so valuable that you are willing to spend a significant amount of money to get the best quality capture possible?
|
To add...
There's really 3 flavors of capture hardware:
- junk
- passable
- ideal
junk = crummy old VCR/camera, no TBC, junk capture card (or even good capture cards, the VCR/TBC situation makes it moot).
passable = good non-TBC JVC S-VHS VCR, ES10/15 (preferably also with DVK) as TBC(ish), good capture card
ideal = JVC/Panasonic VCR with line TBC, actual frame TBC, good capture card
Quote:
Please note that the tradeoff involved in capturing using DV is that your color resolution will be reduced. If you wanted to do any kind of software restoration work or color correction you will get very poor results.
|
True, choma reduced. With NTSC, 4:1:1, really often unacceptable. However, PAL is 4:2:0, and that's a bit better for visual color retention, similar to DVD-Video format (also 4:2:0, though different co-siting).
Quote:
Unfortunately, JVC VCRs have a reputation for eating VHS-C tapes, so given that these tapes are valuable you would be better off with a different brand of VCR--the AG-1980P has its own set of problems but it does do well with VHS-C tapes in the adapter.
|
True, but...
- certain EOL JVC decks did actually work well with VHS-C (but still not a a good as 1980)
- this user is seemingly PAL, so NV-FS200 and HS1000 are the 1980 equivalents (argument often ensues on which of those PAL decks is the truer 1980 PAL version)
Quote:
That's just for playback. You would then need a frame TBC to stabilize the signal. Again, these have gotten very expensive on the used market ($1000+), so you might settle for using the ES10/ES15 to do that.
|
But understand the ES10/15 is a not a TBC, but a crippled+strong line TBC with non-TBC frame sync. There is a fail rate (tapes won't work), and you get the ES10/15 downsides (luma/brightness alterations, posterization, aggressive NR that always on even when "off").
Quote:
As if that weren't enough to deal with, the restoration tools that can make video look as good as it can be are Windows-based.
|
Vapoursynth has some Mac tools. I have no experience with those, however. Hybrid leverages Vapoursynth in the Mac version, so look to use Hybrid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bee_doc
All useful information and I guess what I was really asking is how I can get the best out of a cheap option. So essentially which interfaces to keep/capture the best quality onto digital (albeit it is analog).
I guess S-Video into a PC capture card (or USB) would be an option, but would require more expense in PC card and a higher spec playback device.
|
Cheap without being crap:
(1) Canopus ADVC 50/55/100/110, Panasonic ES10/15, preferably update the VCR with a basic JVC S-VHS from 2/3/4/5000 series (2901, etc). That old camera might work, but you're taking a risk. And the powered VHS-C adapters that look like the JVC CP7U (sold under several brands, mostly Panasonic and JVC).
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookemdano
Too late for me to edit my post, but wanted to correct what I said above about your version of OS X. 10.12 is of course Sierra, not Mountain Lion 
|
I hate the "names" for OS. I always forget, and I never care.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bee_doc
I appreciate my kit is old
|
No.
- old tech = worthless
- legacy tech = still useful, just not sold shiny and new in big box stores
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookemdano
And yes, you can certainly try some captures without the ES10/ES15 and see how it goes.
|
That would be a mistake. It will look bad, guaranteed. Being budget minded is one thing, being a stubborn cheapskate is another. Don't skimp here.
Quote:
The ES10/ES15 will clean up the video quality a bit (may not be that noticeable if the original footage is in good condition)
|
Often stated, but often wrong.
- "not noticeable" in small preview window, sure
- "not noticeable" on a modern TV set, or even full-screen at computer, no
Quote:
Edit: If you do buy an ES10/ES15 then make sure you get a remote with it. Some of the settings you'll need to change are only accessible via remote.
|
Yep, good call. Too many orphaned unit on
eBay. And then remotes alone are often sold by shady Hong Kong sellers (and I have no idea why that is).