Quote:
Originally Posted by benzio
I decided to spend not so few money in a new vcr
|
"new" is nonsense in the 2020s.
Read this:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...emium-nos.html
Assuming it is working correctly, Panasonic is simply artificially sharp at default settings. With the AG-1980, you have to move the sharpen slider left/negative about 1-2 ticks. That's just Panasonic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hodgey
The HS950 actually uses quite different video circuitry to the older HS1000. It's some part-digital processing, using some of the ICs that were also used in the NTSC 1980P model. The HS1000 is more conventional, only using digital processing for the TBC.
Annoyingly Panasonic removed much of the image adjustment on their later models, relying on the automatic adjustment (labelled AI or CVC).
|
hodgey, you're becoming a wealth of knowledge on these PAL VCRs. At some point, I think you surpassed my knowledge here, and I'm now deferring to you at times. Nice.
I still want a PAL Panasonic.
Mostly "just because", as my JVC does everything I need, with the Samsung 5000W providing the non-JVC backup for weird tapes (less than 1 per year).
I'm still torn between these:
FS200
HS1000
I don't want to buy both. The NV-FS200NX is the AG-1980, and I've had one of those (sold it to a member here). I've always considered the FS2000 the PAL version of the 1980. Some have said the FS200 is the AG-1970, but the 1970 is just a really noisy VCR. Like a consumer deck (no NR) with a TBC (slight NR, good stabilization).
Your thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by timtape
the impossible dream.
|
Some people still search in vain for these mythical creatures that "must exist".