Well it depends on what you want to do, I have both units so this is my take on it.
the 40000u does have its advantages:
-15-20 hour recording of SP quality SVHS on 1 DVHS tape using the LS3 setting (LS5 is bad, its 25hours but has macroblocks and just looks like a VCD rather than SVHS/VHS). The LS3 and LS5 settings will not work when recording HD material, it will only work when SVHS-ET is turned on
-some weird kind of tbc/dnr hybrid, its not comparable to the 9000x series but it does have its advantages
-Works pretty good as a passthrough unit if you have an existing setup.
-2hrs of pure HD recording on 1 DVHS tape
The downside is fast forwarding and rewinding a DVHS tape is horrible, works fine for VHS and SVHS tapes but for some reason the "digital" nature of the DVHS recording makes it a bit difficult to rewind and fast foward
That is about the only downside I have seen, playback rivals that of the 9600 and 9900 series and I have had no complaints on my transfers using it
Personally if I had to choose a capture device I would go with the 9911, the 40000u is more of a luxury toy with side benefits or a requirement for HD recording, if you do not have a need for HD it really does not best the 9000x series in any way shape or form.
I was able to get mine on clearance and it has proven to be a valuable tool but in the long run I still would have my 9000x series machines so I would only buy this again to compliment my setup but never as the main unit - markatisu
|