#1  
01-17-2026, 04:45 PM
aburgesser aburgesser is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would appreciate feedback to see if I am doing something wrong with my interlaced tool-chain.

I'm working my way through transcoding NTSC content for hosting on my Plex serve and thought I would give one last honest attempt at preserving interlaced fields. Normally I just use QTMGC as I find combing artifacts very distracting.

The workflow I tired is an Avisynth script to do some field aware/safe filtering from the vob I ripped from DVD. Then I used the x264 encoder in VirtualDub to encode the video stream using the "--tff" option. Finally, I remuxed the video with some AAC encoded audio from an de-interlaced comparison video. MediaInfo confirms the following:
Scan type : MBAFF
Scan type, store method : Interleaved fields
Scan order : Top Field First

The issue is that this result is disappointing when I compare this to the progressive, de-interlaced alternative.
I have tried MPC-BE and VLC (disabled de-interlace) to review. The combing artifacts are still very noticeable and it appears neither player advance the video content by field instead of by frame. I would expect players to replicate interlaced playback by advancing by field at double frame rate instead of updateing the frames in a progressive manner. Worse, the the bobed video enjoys a 14% smaller stream size (probably in part from QTMGC's de-noising) and looks sharper!

It seems to me that with the neglect that interlaced content probably sees in development today, I'm better off using the best de-interlacer I can while transcoding rather than leave it to whatever fast algorithm is used at playback.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
01-31-2026, 01:31 AM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is invisible
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,476
Thanked 2,835 Times in 2,404 Posts
Assuming H.264 here, interlace streams poorly, and most apps/software don't properly understand it. So I'm not sure how far you'll get trying to set up a Plex server. MPEG-2 handles interlace properly, but then large files becomes the issue.

- "Smart" TVs are pretty dumb.
- And various streaming sticks -- Chromecast, Roku, Fire Stick, etc -- are not much better.

The best that can be done for such setups is proper QTGMC. Ideally with 59.94fps, but some content forces 29.97fps due to on-screen clocks/etc that confuse QTGMC bob.

When you look at content with VLC, run the Yadif-2X filter.

Overall some of your reasonings and understanding may be a bit off, but you finds are accurate.

Retaining interlace is mostly for archived master files, or broadcasting. Not streaming, even over LAN.

Remember: there's no rule stating you can only have 1 file. Keep an interlaced lossless (or high bitrate) interlaced max-res 720x480/576 sample. The create "watch copies" for viewing as H.264 deinterlaced, properly cropped (704x480), with overscan masked. That is most ideal.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
02-01-2026, 02:41 PM
Haunted_TBC Haunted_TBC is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 109
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
How would the 704x480 be displayed as 4:3? Via an embedded flag in the file or would another conversion have to be done to get 640x480? Or would it be better to render it at 640 horizontal in the first place?
I suppose 704 horizontal is correct for DVD, but unsure about all the other devices.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
02-02-2026, 03:03 PM
vwestlife vwestlife is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 192
Thanked 35 Times in 31 Posts
Standard-definition video uses a magical thing called non-square pixels: http://www.miraizon.com/support/info_aspectratio.html

The video should contain an aspect ratio flag in its metadata, telling an obedient media player whether it's 4:3 or 16:9.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
02-04-2026, 11:38 AM
Haunted_TBC Haunted_TBC is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 109
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Does Hybrid allow for insertion of a 4:3 flag in its featureset?

Also, does 704x480 NTSC scale correctly the same way 720x480 does when given a 4:3 flag?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
02-04-2026, 12:58 PM
Selur Selur is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 173
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
Hybrid uses PAR signaling: https://forum.selur.net/thread-597.html
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do you lose quality when encode interlaced content as progressive? Nik92 Encode, Convert for discs 3 04-04-2020 06:49 AM
Capture interlaced, but how to to keep video interlaced when making DVDs? premiumcapture Encode, Convert for discs 11 12-21-2013 03:40 PM
Dupe content a.k.a. Google doesn't care if you own the content admin Web Development, Design 1 07-25-2013 07:04 PM
Interlaced vs. non-interlaced artifacts? via Email or PM Capture, Record, Transfer 1 04-16-2009 05:37 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM