03-03-2014, 01:01 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 72
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
When after capturing, im going trhough the videoes with filtering and resizing, the VD has started to crash some 70% after starting to convert. I get the following error message:
" An out-of-bounds memory access (access violation) occurred in module 'huffyuv_mt'... ...reading address .. "
I`m using the virtualdub from this site.
Anyone have any suggestions?
With Regards.
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Ads / Sponsors
|
|
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
03-03-2014, 09:22 AM
|
|
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,311
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
|
|
Did you try using non-multithreaded (MT) Huffyuv?
- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site. - Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter
- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
|
The following users thank kpmedia for this useful post:
knumag (03-09-2014)
|
03-03-2014, 11:10 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 72
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
trying now, i gad captured already 4-5 hours of video with MT, but cant use it. Very messy codec to use with virtualdub it seems.
|
03-03-2014, 11:57 AM
|
|
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,311
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
|
|
Yeah, MT is great for post-capture processing to another intermediary codec, but somewhat lousy for capturing. The multithreading doesn't do anything for capturing anyway. (It could even be argued that the MT doesn't help much at all. Maybe a 10-20% performance boost at most? The bottleneck is still I/O, not CPU, for Huffyuv/lossless.)
- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site. - Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter
- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
|
03-03-2014, 12:02 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 585
Thanked 72 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
I would suggest if you have the hdd space capturing uncompressed and then opening the file in vdub and changing the codec. I often use two hdd, one for capture and the second for the final version. It's not good to read and write to the same drive for something so heavy (excess wear and much slower).
|
03-03-2014, 12:12 PM
|
|
Site Staff | Video
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,503
Thanked 2,449 Times in 2,081 Posts
|
|
Uncompressed capturing is not suggested. The I/O is 200%+ higher than lossless, meaning it can drop frames much easier. There is zero quality to gain at 4:2:2 YUY2 compressed vs. Huffyuv, Lagarith, etc.
And yes, that can include secondary video-only drives. Remember that the motherboard drive chipset is important, too, when it comes to I/O!
|
03-03-2014, 12:15 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 585
Thanked 72 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
I use 10k raptors so i never noticed, i guess it comes down to resource balancing
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM
|