Go Back    Forum > Digital Video > Video Project Help > Restore, Filter, Improve Quality

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
05-12-2016, 02:23 PM
three_jeeps three_jeeps is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 26
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I was reading through the the VHS buying guide:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...ing-guide.html

and have a few questions. In a previous inquiry, it was recommended that I use (in pass through mode) a panasonic DMR-ES10 or ES15 in conjunction with my TBC-1000.

When looking at the buying guide, those models don't make it on the 'recommendation' list. I am wondering why??

Would a, AG-1970P, for example, be a better option over the ES-1x?
Of the ES-xx, which one would be a better option? -10, -15, -20? or other?
THanks
J
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
05-12-2016, 04:29 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by three_jeeps View Post
I was reading through the the VHS buying guide:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...ing-guide.html

and have a few questions. In a previous inquiry, it was recommended that I use (in pass through mode) a panasonic DMR-ES10 or ES15 in conjunction with my TBC-1000.

When looking at the buying guide, those models don't make it on the 'recommendation' list. I am wondering why??
The DMR-ES10 and ES15 are not VCR's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by three_jeeps View Post
Would a, AG-1970P, for example, be a better option over the ES-1x?
Of the ES-xx, which one would be a better option? -10, -15, -20? or other?
The AG-1970P is an OK player but has a weak built-in line sync tbc. To get line tbc functionality, use the ES10 or ES15 for line-level tbc pass-thru. Follow that in the capture chain with your TBC-1000, which is a frame-level tbc. The DMR-ES20 has a weak line tbc circuit, not recommended for pass-thru. If you use a vcr with a better line-level tbc built-in, you don't need a pass-thru device.
http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/3...hat-do-you-use

Last edited by sanlyn; 05-12-2016 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
05-12-2016, 09:56 PM
three_jeeps three_jeeps is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 26
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ohhh, I didn't realize they don't have VHS record capability. Thanks for pointing that out.

J
Reply With Quote
  #4  
05-13-2016, 09:23 AM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
The ES10 and ES15 are DVD recorders/DVD players. They have fairly effective line-tbc and some frame sync capability. Their frame sync will not defeat macrovision the way a TBC-1000 or similar external frame tbc will. Either DVDR is used for its line-tbc capability if you are using a VCR that doesn't have a built-in line tbc. If you are capturing to lossless media with a non-tbc VCR the capture chain would look like this:

VCR --> ES10/ES15 pass thru --> TBC-1000 --> capture device

The ES10 has a somewhat stronger tbc than the ES15 and is the preferred unit, but both work OK. Most DVD recorders don't work for pass thru. Most of the very few newer units that can be used for pass thru are not very effective, making them useless for that purpose. The forum link mentioned earlier tested several units for use as pass thru.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
05-13-2016, 10:29 AM
three_jeeps three_jeeps is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 26
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanlyn View Post
If you are capturing to lossless media with a non-tbc VCR the capture chain would look like this:

VCR --> ES10/ES15 pass thru --> TBC-1000 --> capture device

The ES10 has a somewhat stronger tbc than the ES15 and is the preferred unit, but both work OK.
OK, TY. I had quite a different connection/workflow path. Now that I realize the ES10 is strictly a DVR, the chaining you show makes a lot more sense. For some reason, I was equating the functionality of the ES10 to my LG - RC-199H (vcr-DVD combo).
So this raises the question of what other boxes would have the functionality of the ES10? and would they be worth considering?

I have 4 different VCRs to experiment with, ranging from an older panasonic (1980ish) that has manual tracking adjustment, a sharp unit that will play svhs tapes (of which I have a few), and the LG whos video out feed can be switched between the VCR or DVD, and has HDMI output (upconverted) as well as progressive scan out, and A/V out.
Thanks again for your insight.
J
Reply With Quote
  #6  
05-13-2016, 12:02 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by three_jeeps View Post
So this raises the question of what other boxes would have the functionality of the ES10? and would they be worth considering?
There are a couple of rare units that have been used in the linked thread, but the ES10/15 are easy to find and affordable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by three_jeeps View Post
I have 4 different VCRs to experiment with, ranging from an older panasonic (1980ish) that has manual tracking adjustment, a sharp unit that will play svhs tapes (of which I have a few), and the LG whos video out feed can be switched between the VCR or DVD, and has HDMI output (upconverted) as well as progressive scan out, and A/V out.
I have a similar Panasonic PV-S4670 circa 1996, whose image resembles that of the AG-1980 series but without tbc or noise reduction. Combo units have fairly decent DVD sections, but their VCR sections are junk.

There are HDMI capture devices. They don't record to lossless media, but to lossy final delivery formats that are unsuitable for restoration work. Upscalers also upscale analog defects. Once embedded as artifacts through lossy encoding and added compression artifacts, you're pretty much stuck with them. Analog tape is either interlaced or telecined and should remain that way, especially if you want formal DVD or HD/StandardDef BluRay or AVCHD. H.264 capture is inferior to lossless capture and your own encoding. If you want to get complicated with noisy, lossy analog tape captures, it's not something I'd recommend to my friends.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
05-13-2016, 01:51 PM
msgohan msgohan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 334 Times in 276 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanlyn View Post
There are HDMI capture devices. They don't record to lossless media, but to lossy final delivery formats
There are HDMI capture devices that do lossless. I have 4 of them, and 1 external SSD recorder that does uncompressed or lossy intermediate.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
05-13-2016, 02:33 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
Three_jeeps might want more detail. I was thinking of the usual HDPVR.

But the problem via hdMI is that the combo deck would be used, which doesn't have a quality VCR player. How to get line and frame tbc via HDMI? Not a problem for me because I don't intend to use this method for VHS capture. It's three-jeeps' question.

Last edited by sanlyn; 05-13-2016 at 03:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
05-13-2016, 09:57 PM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
Okay, one HDMI device for lossless caps through VirtualDub with a lossless codec like UT Video would be here: https://www.startech.com/AV/Converte...-vga~USB3HDCAP. As msgohan is familiar with this device from another forum, I'll guess that the Startech is one of his 4 devices. But you'll have to use an external VCR and line tbc pass-thru into your combo unit.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
05-13-2016, 10:08 PM
msgohan msgohan is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 334 Times in 276 Posts
Yeah, I wasn't recommending this setup for him. I was just letting you know for future reference. Sorry for the tangent.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
05-14-2016, 08:41 AM
sanlyn sanlyn is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Carolina and NY, USA
Posts: 3,648
Thanked 1,308 Times in 982 Posts
I figured that, thanks. Its not a method I'm willing to hassle with at this point (no similar combo unit here), and the 15 or so tapes I have left for capture are ugly noisy stuff from the early 1990's. Three_jeeps said in another thread he wanted to experiment, but I'd suggest getting conventional lossless capture under the belt first, which in itself would be an education.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are my PAL VHS decks worth? mr-vhsc General Discussion 6 12-24-2015 11:49 AM
Deciding between two pro S-VHS decks? V431 Capture, Record, Transfer 2 10-27-2014 10:24 AM
Several JVC S-VHS decks for sale [SOLD] volksjager Marketplace 4 01-17-2014 02:59 PM
Wanted: Panasonic Z-Mechanism decks volksjager Video Hardware Repair 5 05-04-2013 09:36 AM
TBC differences on DVHS decks? AndyO6322 Capture, Record, Transfer 3 04-22-2013 12:14 AM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM