Quantcast Avisynth: Peach Smoother? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
03-18-2003, 01:00 PM
KingTuk KingTuk is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kwag,

How good is Peach Smoother speed and quality?

In another thread you were using it with these options...

PeachSmoother(NoiseReduction=45,Stability=15,Spati al=70,NoiseLevel=4.8,Baseline=3.2)

Thanks...

http://students.washington.edu/ldubb...chSmoother.zip
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
03-18-2003, 01:08 PM
digitalize digitalize is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PeachSmoother is great!!!! It is way faster than FaeryDust but with comparable results. If you use the PeachSmoother(READOUT=TRUE)option, two numbers show up in your output video file that tell you your average noise and the lowest noise it saw in the video. You can then manually set your NoiseLevel and Baseline settings using these numbers, to speed it up even more, instead of having PeachSmoother automatically figure out the noise while it is encoding.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
03-18-2003, 01:53 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi KingTuk,

The values I used were the ones that were used by the person who evaluated the filter over at doom9. Now I'll use the "(READOUT=TRUE)" option as recommended by digitalize ( thanks digitalize!)
That's what I get for not RTFM

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #4  
03-20-2003, 11:01 PM
Reno Reno is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey guys, would substituting this filter for Spacedust and Fluxsmooth in conjunction be a good idea, or would I see a drop in detail??
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
03-20-2003, 11:26 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Don't use Peach. Read the comments on it's flaws here in the forum.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #6  
03-20-2003, 11:34 PM
Reno Reno is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bummer.

Thanks, Kwag
__________________
"There are two rules for ultimate success in life.
1. Never tell everything you know."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
03-27-2003, 12:36 PM
digitalize digitalize is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
From Doom9.org

"If the programmer of Peach has any time to look at anything, a bug has been noticed in Peachsmoother where some objects remain stationary when they should be moving very slightly..."
Reply:
"You’re seeing the standard behavior where the Peach is really, really sure that there’s no motion. Usually that means the noise estimate is off — Take a look at the docs on the “dot” option and on the “I’m seeing lots of blurring...” question."

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...threadid=44335
Reply With Quote
  #8  
03-28-2003, 12:43 AM
dazedconfused dazedconfused is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 316
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey digitalize, have a look at this thread in the KDVD forum: http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=21284 . It seems that no amount of peach-parameter-tweaking will make the vertical-movement problems disappear....it's built-in. But I hope Lindsey throws some more sugar on that Peach of his, 'cause it certainly has some sweet potential. Dust is a better filter qualitywise for the time being though.
-d&c
Reply With Quote
  #9  
03-28-2003, 01:55 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi dazed&confused,

You're 100% correct
I've tried every parameter, and any way I try them, I still get flaws on vertical movement. There's something wrong with the filter, and no matter what parameters I try, the effect is still there.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avisynth: Temporal Smoother? Yatti Avisynth Scripting 4 09-07-2004 10:59 PM
Avisynth: Peach, GrapeSmoother and GuavaComb for AVS 2.5 vmesquita Avisynth Scripting 0 09-02-2003 02:50 PM
Avisynth: Temporal smoother? ARAGORN Avisynth Scripting 2 10-31-2002 02:56 AM
Avisynth: Temporal smoother help please! Bombero0437 Avisynth Scripting 3 09-23-2002 12:09 PM
Avisynth: Temporal Smoother? gbon Avisynth Scripting 7 08-30-2002 01:48 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM  —  vBulletin Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd