04-01-2003, 02:10 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Here's the latest test script. Valid for the next 10 minutes
Code:
LegalClip()
GripCrop(528, 480, overscan=2, source_anamorphic=false )
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
mergechroma(blur(1.58))
mergeluma(blur(0.05))
SpaceDust()
TemporalSmoother(radius=2, strength=3)
TemporalCleaner(ythresh=5, cthresh=10)
STMedianFilter(6,15,4,7,6,15)
DctFilter(1,1,1,1,1,.5,.5,0)
GripBorders()
LegalClip()
-kwag
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
04-01-2003, 02:14 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
 as long as that?? I thought it would of been much shorter hehehe
|
04-01-2003, 02:32 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Here's the latest test script. Valid for the next 10 minutes
Code:
LegalClip()
GripCrop(528, 480, overscan=2, source_anamorphic=false )
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
mergechroma(blur(1.58))
mergeluma(blur(0.05))
SpaceDust()
TemporalSmoother(radius=2, strength=3)
TemporalCleaner(ythresh=5, cthresh=10)
STMedianFilter(6,15,4,7,6,15)
DctFilter(1,1,1,1,1,.5,.5,0)
GripBorders()
LegalClip()
-kwag
|
I get a smaller filesize by putting SpaceDust() between TemporalSmoother and TemporalCleaner...
|
04-01-2003, 02:39 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks!
|
04-01-2003, 03:00 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTuk
I get a smaller filesize by putting SpaceDust() between TemporalSmoother and TemporalCleaner...
|
You see, I told'ya it was only going to last 10 minutes 
It actually lasted ~20
|
04-01-2003, 03:19 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I see that!!!
That's why I suggested that you post it once a week.... Whatever is the latest script at the time.
Otherwise... you are absolutely right... There is going to be a new one every 10 minutes....
DorvalCS
|
04-01-2003, 03:41 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MD, US
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
At least we'll only have to look through one thread to find the lastest!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DorvalCS
That's why I suggested that you post it once a week.... Whatever is the latest script at the time.
Otherwise... you are absolutely right... There is going to be a new one every 10 minutes....
|
|
04-01-2003, 04:15 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
maybe there´s something wrong with my eys.
i compared kwag´s script with this script
Code:
mergechroma(blur(1.58 ))
mergeluma(blur(0.05 ))
LegalClip()
GripCrop(528, 576, overscan=1, source_anamorphic=false)
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
SpaceDust()
Convolution3D(preset="movieLQ")
GripBorders()
LegalClip()
i got a video with this script , which is a lot less blury and a bit sharper.
i made samples with both script´s at cq 65 and 70.
strange. the more filters, the more blury the video?
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-01-2003, 10:15 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
kwag, can we see a sample using this script?
|
04-01-2003, 10:32 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by conquest10
kwag, can we see a sample using this script?
|
Check the last posts here: http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3366&start=45
My latest test script is this:
Code:
LegalClip()
GripCrop(528, 480, overscan=2, source_anamorphic=false )
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
SpaceDust()
sharpen(1.0)
mergechroma(blur(1.58))
mergeluma(blur(1.0))
GripBorders()
LetterBox(16, 16, 16, 16)
LegalClip()
Info on the link above.
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 11:56 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
To be tested:
Code:
--- GripSize Line Here---
SpaceDust()
sharpen(1.0)
TemporalSmoother(radius=2, strength=2)
TemporalCleaner(ythresh=1, cthresh=15)
mergechroma(blur(1.58))
mergeluma(blur(.7))
--- GripBorders Line Here ---
Added TemporalSmoother with very small strength and radius values.
Added TemporalCleaner with very strong treshold ONLY on chroma and minimal value for luma.
This drops file size considerably, while still retaining quality without "smearing" the picture.
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 01:32 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
i can see no difference in image quality between those two script, but the script WITH temporalcleaner and smoother was 0,1MB bigger than the other i took 90sec longer to encode
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-02-2003, 01:56 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: a PAL land (UK)
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Those TemporalSmoother values dont look too different from the first script you posted...
|
04-02-2003, 02:02 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PyRoMaNiA
Those TemporalSmoother values dont look too different from the first script you posted...
|
Sure they do!.
The originals:
Code:
TemporalSmoother(radius=2, strength=3)
TemporalCleaner(ythresh=5, cthresh=10)
The new ones:
Code:
TemporalSmoother(radius=2, strength=2)
TemporalCleaner(ythresh=1, cthresh=15)
That makes a huge difference
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 02:04 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane
i can see no difference in image quality between those two script, but the script WITH temporalcleaner and smoother was 0,1MB bigger than the other i took 90sec longer to encode
|
The image quality is identical, but the file size with the temporals will be smaller. Sure you didn't mix the encodes
There's no way a file size can be larger with the temporal filters
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 02:07 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
what does this line make source_anamorphic=false ? Havent seen it before...
|
04-02-2003, 02:11 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm not sure if anyone here remembers the original "The Green Mile" samples posted last year. So here's a new sample created with the script above, using MIN=64Kbps, MAX=1,150Kbps and a CQ of 80. Full sampler size was ~12MB, which is the correct size to target the complete 180 minute movie on one CD at 352x240. Here a 30 second clip so you can see how it looks. http://www.kvcd.net/mile-2003.mpg
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 02:11 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfi
what does this line make source_anamorphic=false ? Havent seen it before...
|
That's created automatically by MovieStacker, depending on your source.
-kwag
|
04-02-2003, 02:14 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
i made those sample both with cq 70 to see, if there´s a difference in file size
now i make prediction with ToK for both scripts, let you know, what comes out
__________________
greetz Kane
|
04-02-2003, 02:20 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My file size difference using the temporal filters is ~150KB lower per every 30 seconds. Let me know your results
-kwag
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|