Quantcast TMPGEnc: Dual Processors System vs Single Processor System - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
05-10-2002, 05:43 PM
Learner Learner is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi all, My friend just give me a dual pentium3 550Mhz system (board and CPU only). If I built this system, will it improve the time to encode (from 5hrs to 3hrs) under Tmpgenc program.

I know the program support dual CPU system setup. Just wondering who had this experience??? or just waste money.

My currently system is p3-933Mhz, winxp pro (dual CPU supported)
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
05-10-2002, 09:52 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Learner
Hi all, My friend just give me a dual pentium3 550Mhz system (board and CPU only). If I built this system, will it improve the time to encode (from 5hrs to 3hrs) under Tmpgenc program.

I know the program support dual CPU system setup. Just wondering who had this experience??? or just waste money.

My currently system is p3-933Mhz, winxp pro (dual CPU supported)
You won't get an increase in speed with the dual 550, because TMPEG uses the second processor only for filters. So for regular encodes, your time will be around 10+ hours with the 550 processors. I had a ASUS P2B dual P3 500Mhz, and that was my encoding time.

kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
05-10-2002, 11:46 PM
deltaboy deltaboy is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i am currently running a dual 866 PIII with 512 RAM and my encoding times are around 4-5 hrs.

dual CPUs wont increase your speed by 2 fold, but will allow you to multitask. you could possibly encode 2 videos simutaneously with the encoding times increasing just a bit. but then you get REAL slow system performance.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
05-10-2002, 11:53 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaboy
i am currently running a dual 866 PIII with 512 RAM and my encoding times are around 4-5 hrs.

dual CPUs wont increase your speed by 2 fold, but will allow you to multitask. you could possibly encode 2 videos simutaneously with the encoding times increasing just a bit. but then you get REAL slow system performance.
For that, yes! You can run 2 sessions of TMPEG and assign one processor to each. And make two encodes in the time it would take one encode in a single CPU.

If you set the priority of each task to normal, your system won't suffer too much, and will be responsive. This is of course in Win2K or XP.

kwag
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
System Tune-up black prince Computers 7 10-27-2005 05:58 PM
TMPGEnc: what is the difference between MPEG-1 System and MPEG-1 VideoCD Major Video Encoding and Conversion 3 10-22-2004 02:55 PM
TMPGEnc: TMPGEnc aborts, reboots system melmo Video Encoding and Conversion 1 07-20-2004 03:25 PM
TMPGEnc: System Crash in TMPGENC daddyboy Video Encoding and Conversion 11 06-27-2004 02:44 PM
Windows xp system disc! cashjuve Computers 3 10-01-2003 07:47 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd