Quantcast Bitrates: CQmatic Bug Reports - Page 6 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #101  
07-24-2003, 08:23 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beta 6 test :

5 tries, then he found a cq of 51,50...
encoded same movie with 57 as cq, filesize (only videostream) was ca. 840mb i think , instead of 685...so the cq could go right!

don´t have the bug with the loop
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #102  
07-24-2003, 08:35 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger
don´t have the bug with the loop
What TV-System do you have PAL
Reply With Quote
  #103  
07-24-2003, 08:39 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Grab it: http://www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-1.0b7.exe

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #104  
07-24-2003, 08:52 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Testing right now, thx :P
I'm sorry but i'll be offline in ~10 mins. Hopefully another user has the same problem as i have
My girlfriend has no internet connection at all. Thats the next thing i'll change

CQ's: 60, 57.38, 56.07, 55.41 ...
Reply With Quote
  #105  
07-24-2003, 08:55 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
My girlfriend has no internet connection at all. Thats the next thing i'll change
The connection, or your girlfriend

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #106  
07-24-2003, 08:57 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yes i have pal (germany)

well, beta6 gave me a cq of 51,50, whichs seems to be realistic , but manually i got an cq of 54, well must check it...

will test beta7 with shorter movies to get faster results, which i can post
Reply With Quote
  #107  
07-24-2003, 08:57 AM
jorel jorel is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
with versions 1.0b6 and b7 the CQ increase from
CQ63,10 to CQ63,62 ,just the same final prediction for each.

remeber,i got perfect final size 290mb with CQ63!

Reply With Quote
  #108  
07-24-2003, 08:58 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
The connection, or your girlfriend

I'm glad my girlriend doesn't watch. She would do this:
I just phoned her to get 15 mins....
Reply With Quote
  #109  
07-24-2003, 09:03 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Jorel,
great results. How many tries does CQMatic need to find final CQ
You post your results sooo fast
Mine takes about 5-10...
Reply With Quote
  #110  
07-24-2003, 09:05 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Mine takes about 5-10...
Not anymore with BETA 7

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #111  
07-24-2003, 09:07 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
running 9th at the moment and still not finished. Maybe because of the short video length.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
07-24-2003, 09:11 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
running 9th at the moment and still not finished. Maybe because of the short video length.
Yes. What are the CQs being shown
Reply With Quote
  #113  
07-24-2003, 09:16 AM
Krassi Krassi is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
60, 57.38, 56.07, 55.41, 55.08, 54.92, 54.84, 54.80, 54.78, 54.77, 54.66, 54.66....stuck again.

I'm offline now, sorry. See you tomorrow
Reply With Quote
  #114  
07-24-2003, 09:22 AM
jorel jorel is offline
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my sample is short and i got the result after
CQMatic search only 3 times for final prediction.

Reply With Quote
  #115  
07-24-2003, 09:30 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well as i can see now, beta7 is giving me a LOWER cq then beta6
Reply With Quote
  #116  
07-24-2003, 09:34 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beta6 : 51,50
beta7 : 48,18
Reply With Quote
  #117  
07-24-2003, 09:38 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger
well as i can see now, beta7 is giving me a LOWER cq then beta6
Your CQ should be no lower than 0.25 difference from previous
So if your last CQ was say 62.50 and your current is 62.74, your final CQ is 62.50
Does that difference match your predicted CQ values. It has to

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #118  
07-24-2003, 09:45 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
found sth in tmpeg, the aspect ratio was another then in the test with beta6!

testing now with THE EXACT SAME settings like beta6...

perhaps this was the reason why my filesize was always much lower then i expected and wanted?

í´ll do a couple of tests now...
Reply With Quote
  #119  
07-24-2003, 10:04 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
60, 57.38, 56.07, 55.41, 55.08, 54.92, 54.84, 54.80, 54.78, 54.77, 54.66, 54.66....stuck again.

I'm offline now, sorry. See you tomorrow
That's weird
It should have stopped after 55.08, 54.92 because Abs( 54.92 - 55.08 ) = 0.16 which is below 0.25 (the trigger point) and encode at 55.08
I'm encoding something now to verify this. Unless my Abs (Absolute value) is screwed up

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #120  
07-24-2003, 10:11 AM
tigger tigger is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my result :

beta6: 51,50
beta7: 51,18

now EXACT same settings, so with another aspect ratio, i got a lower cq (perhaps the reason of my problem with my filesize?)

well, will take this cq now, and encode it as 16:9...
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bitrates: CQMatic 1.4.08 Metabodom Video Encoding and Conversion 2 05-22-2005 07:01 AM
Bitrates: CQmatic nighthawk Video Encoding and Conversion 36 01-14-2004 11:20 AM
Bitrates: CQMatic Version 1.2.03 Reports kwag Video Encoding and Conversion 24 11-16-2003 05:33 AM
Bitrates: Help when CQMatic is over/under J-Wo Video Encoding and Conversion 1 08-23-2003 12:19 PM
Bitrates: KDVD bitrates with CQMatic nicksteel Video Encoding and Conversion 10 08-06-2003 08:44 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd