Quantcast Bitrates: Why Not Have a CQ Over 90? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion
Reload this Page Bitrates: Why Not Have a CQ Over 90?
Ask Question   FAQ     Today's Posts

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
02-09-2004, 09:23 AM
niqob niqob is offline
Free Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a simple question: Why doesn't CQMatic go over CQ of 90? I mean is there a good reason why it doesn't do that?
I often make 2cd skvcd's so I would need it to go over 90...
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
02-09-2004, 09:27 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
  
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Above 90 it's only waste of space for the same visual result. That's why Kwag choosed this limit.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bitrates: Why does everyone like CQ instead of CBR? Shibblet Video Encoding and Conversion 1 10-31-2004 06:36 AM
Bitrates: Multiple audio bitrates and DGMPGDec compatibility rds_correia Video Encoding and Conversion 11 10-23-2004 10:14 PM
Bitrates: Cq vbr bigggt Video Encoding and Conversion 3 02-29-2004 07:43 PM
Bitrates: CQ always 89.77. muhali3 Video Encoding and Conversion 15 10-25-2003 03:16 PM
Bitrates: KDVD bitrates with CQMatic nicksteel Video Encoding and Conversion 10 08-06-2003 08:44 AM

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Top of Page  -  Site Home  -  Forum Home  -  Archive  -  Forum Policies