Go Back    Forum > Digital Life > Computers

LinkBack Thread Tools
03-18-2010, 12:38 PM
cyber-junkie cyber-junkie is offline
Free Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Something else, what type of monitor is best for viewing the video and corrections, I assume one the these standard LCD's?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
03-22-2010, 03:29 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff | Web Development
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,307
Thanked 655 Times in 457 Posts
You want a viewing device that is not artificially "pumped up" in some way. Due to consumer stupidity and idiot salesmen, the trend in recent years has been for "sharp, bright and colorful" displays, even when the displayed video is being destroyed in the process.

Stores displays were often set to max saturation, sharpness and brightness values, because the obnoxious store showroom florescent lights would make a properly-set display look dim. Dim made colors look less vibrant. The "sharpness" thing came later, as everybody expected everything to be "HD". Nevermind that the displays were already high resolution -- often higher pixel counts than the 1080p/720p HDTVs!

In time, manufacturers started to optimize displays for the same scenario. Many default settings are just dreadful.

Few people ever stopped to think that "bright and colorful" looks like trash in your home or office. It abuses and butchers the image you're looking at, and it leads to much confusion when a person notices their DVD looks different on the TV set than it did on the computer. Or when a printed image/photo is different than what they saw on screen.

Many image purists have gone on to claim CRTs are superior to LCD for this reason, but that's just as incorrect. CRT had their own flaws with tint shifts, geometry and clarity.

Now that you know all that, here's the answer to your question...

Look for an LCD monitor that can be highly adjusted, especially for brightness/gamma, contrast/black level (IRE), temperature (in Kelvin, i.e. 6500K), and maybe even pixel brightness.

You don't want "bright and colorful", you want accurate. If the color is dull, then you want to see it in its full dull glory.

Many of the popular name brands like HP, Samsung and Dell look like crap. I've been very fond of LG and Acer branded monitors. In fact, there is a really decent 22" Acer for about $150-175. This is it: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...SIN=B0016D02JE

Although a bit inferior to my now-unavailable (and smaller) LG monitor, this Acer has been an excellent unit for the second workstation. A few times I've considered going dual-monitor, with two of them side by side, for the heavyweight editing and production work.

There are far more pricey "studio-grade" calibrated monitors, but those are really not all that necessary. With consumer devices and monitors being all over the place, the need for perfection is not what it used to be -- even the most calibrated video work will look dismal on a lot of the junk displays used by customers and consumers.

- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Archiving video for viewing? matt- Project Planning, Workflows 3 09-25-2009 12:12 AM
Need resize filter for VitualDub Dewey Encode, Convert for discs 2 03-09-2009 03:17 AM
MPEG-4 for TV Viewing GMaq Videography: Cameras, TVs and Players 8 01-03-2006 01:30 PM
Correct monitor hook up during capturing 777sp2 Capture, Record, Transfer 1 09-28-2005 04:10 PM

Thread Tools

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM