#1  
04-19-2021, 05:42 PM
stymie stymie is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 23
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
I'm thinking about replacing the version of HuffYUV v2.1.1 CCESP Patch v0.2.2 which I have installed with v0.2.5. Are there any problems (such as capture rates, file size, compatibility, quality, etc) with using v0.2.5 for capturing and editing instead of v0.2.2? One difference I noted is that v0.2.5 doesn't have a Field Threshold option in the Virtualdub 1.9.11 HuffYUV configuration dialog. I know the multi-threaded version isn't recommended, but didn't know if there were any issues or reasons not to use v0.2.5? I'm currently using Virtualdub 1.9.11 for capture, and 32 and 64 bit versions of Avisynth+, Virutaldub2, FFMPEG, TMPGEnc, etc for editing/encoding of VHS and 8mm analog tapes.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lossless HuffYUV with ATI MMC Tony_Shaul Capture, Record, Transfer 4 07-23-2017 09:53 PM
Uncompressed 8-bit vs 10-bit MOV to Huffyuv AVI? metaleonid Capture, Record, Transfer 4 07-29-2014 06:41 AM
ATI MMC 9.02 with bad Huffyuv AVI? dianedebuda Capture, Record, Transfer 1 01-17-2014 11:32 AM
What version of HUFFYUV 777sp2 Encode, Convert for discs 5 10-06-2005 05:35 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM