Beware of the SingMai scammer!

[radiokom]

There is one more thing to note about bank transfers in Europe. All you need is the IBAN bank account number. The recipient's name is for informational purposes only (it will be changed soon due to scammers). If I send you my IBAN number and you specify Joseph Biden as the recipient and the subject "for donations to cure Alzheimer's disease", I will still receive the money.

Edit: In case someone gives you "Dan's bank account" in the UK or anywhere to transfer money to, it would be appropriate to report this to that bank (the bank code is included in the IBAN number).

[lordsmurf]

I'm proud of our forum members.

Quote:

Originally Posted by radiokom

All (any) rights to act on the deceased's accounts end upon the deceased's death. Any actions taken with the deceased's accounts after his death are a criminal offense. And a serious one. So it's all bullshit.

Yes, correct. I wasn't going to tell the scammer why he's a dumbass, but that's part of it. Deceased persons cannot be named on, and certainly not hold, bank accounts. Not anywhere in the civilized world that I'm aware. Furthermore, debtors are not legally allowed to collect funds from a decedent's bank account. Banking laws are very strict here, because accounts could be used for money laundering.

Quote:

Originally Posted by radiokom

There is one more thing to note about bank transfers in Europe. All you need is the IBAN bank account number. The recipient's name is for informational purposes only (it will be changed soon due to scammers). If I send you my IBAN number and you specify Joseph Biden as the recipient and the subject "for donations to cure Alzheimer's disease", I will still receive the money.

I was not aware that account names were immaterial on IBAN. Yikes! Note to self!
That's not how SWIFT banking works.

Quote:

Edit: In case someone gives you "Dan's bank account" in the UK or anywhere to transfer money to, it would be appropriate to report this to that bank (the bank code is included in the IBAN number).

I was going to contact a UK friend, but are you able to report this in your EU non-UK location?

In one of Barry's image attachments, it shows the scammer's banking app.
IBAN = GB35CLYD826030800061577, BIC = CLYDGB21B30
The bank associated is Clydesdale Bank PLC. Contact them = https://secure.cbonline.co.uk/contact-us/

I sent an email to their phishing address, but nothing may come of that. Somebody in UK (or elsewhere EU?) probably needs to call them. I no longer have an international calling plan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by latreche34

Who the hell is Jangrockwood to speak in the name of a family? There are legal ways to liquidate a company assets, Has she gone through that process? If so, can she show us some auction dates and websites, she can also setup meetings with interested people to discuss such matters in private, not begging for money through a messaging system.

This really depends on factors. Private sale is not out of the question. But what you say can also be true. Again, depends.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

Well, I started this crapfest. Shall we stop it now?

You seem to be a character magnet. Some real kooks flock to you. But it's a good thing that you brings stuff to our attention, I certainly always appreciate you for it.

[BarryTheCrab]

Heeeey, some of my best friends are kooks!

[radiokom]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lordsmurf

I was going to contact a UK friend, but are you able to report this in your EU non-UK location?

In one of Barry's image attachments, it shows the scammer's banking app.
IBAN = GB35CLYD826030800061577, BIC = CLYDGB21B30
The bank associated is Clydesdale Bank PLC. Contact them = https://secure.cbonline.co.uk/contact-us/

I sent an email to their phishing address, but nothing may come of that. Somebody in UK (or elsewhere EU?) probably needs to call them. I no longer have an international calling plan.

That won't work, it's the responsibility of each individual bank to process and take into account warnings about potential risks. Until someone who has been scammed has reported it to the police and they have not initiated criminal proceedings. The rules that only the account number should be taken into account for IBAN payments have caused many problems, not only in cases of fraud. It's enough to make a mistake and enter the wrong account number for the money to be transferred, and then the PITA procedures to get it back (if it works at all) are started. That's why changes are now expected in the IBAN payment rules, but no one can figure out what to do with the recipient's name/title - it is often entered incompletely or abbreviated, and then the payment will have to be suspended. I don't see a particular problem there - the recipient of the payment should indicate the exact name in the payment details as it is registered in the bank. And if the account number does not match the registered name, the recipient's bank is obliged to suspend it, not transfer it to the recipient's account. That, at least, would be correct.

[lordsmurf]

After 2 more days of no contact from Jangrockwood, I've banned the account.

However, not without some last minute due diligence. The email address used for that account is "nickkykornpichet@gmail.com". Google has no results for that full email. But when you put "nickkykornpichet" into Google, one of the first results is some sort of softcore Thai gay porn on Instagram.

The registration IP was from Thailand.

We have no idea who this is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

crapfest.

This is a perfect word for the situation.

We all wish the SingMai SM03 would have worked. It never did. It likely never existed beyond prototypes.

[Bogilein]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lordsmurf

It likely never existed beyond prototypes.

That's not entirely true. I know two people who have the SM03 device.

One has the old and the new device, and the other has the new device.

As far as I know, the devices were only manufactured after orders were placed.

Singmai was basically a small one-man company.

[lordsmurf]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogilein

That's not entirely true. I know two people who have the SM03 device.
One has the old and the new device, and the other has the new device.
As far as I know, the devices were only manufactured after orders were placed.
Singmai was basically a small one-man company.

Thanks for that bit of info, however...

How well do you know the people making this claim? I've known people online that make false claims about items existing.

I trust your information ... you've earned it. But I just want to know how well you trust them.

Assuming all is accurate, this is great news, he made some items before passing. But I've not seen/read any feedback on performance. If he was one-off making these units manually, then I'd suggest those are all unique prototypes. It's not really non-prototype until you start some sort of scale production, even if small.

[Bogilein]

I would trust the person who owns both devices for 90% and the person who owns the new SM03 device for 99.9%.

On the other point, I agree with you. Somehow, they are all prototypes. I don't think the devices were intended for mass production.
For your information, I ordered the old device in February 2023 and was told that it would be ready in a week. Then it was two weeks, then three weeks. They couldn't get the Altera FPGA anymore. The alternatives didn't work, and the result was that the SM03 was discontinued and my order was canceled.

From this, I conclude that there are no remaining stocks and that they only produced after someone placed a order. The same applies to the new device. Anyone who has read his online diaries can then figure out the rest for themselves.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240720...//danploy.com/

[BarryTheCrab]

But the way that is not the thread title started by me and I don’t appreciate being edited in that manner.

[Bogilein]

My information should only serve to show that there are a few devices available to users, but no one should get their hopes up that there are dozens of devices in a warehouse that can be purchased, regardless of what anyone promises.

Some posts make it sound as if the SM03 is the Holy Grail that just needs to be found. That is not the case.

As far as I can see, none of the people who contacted Dan by email received a scam email.

[lordsmurf]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogilein

I would trust the person who owns both devices for 90% and the person who owns the new SM03 device for 99.9%.

I saw this earlier today: https://forum.lddb.com/viewtopic.php...9602&start=100

Is that the person you refer to, who has both units? nidi from Switzerland?

I notice that some of the posters there have the same doubts and experiences that I do, the old "pics or it doesn't exist" rightful attitude. reelyinteresting was especially spot-on in his comments.

Quote:

On the other point, I agree with you. Somehow, they are all prototypes. I don't think the devices were intended for mass production.
For your information, I ordered the old device in February 2023 and was told that it would be ready in a week. Then it was two weeks, then three weeks. They couldn't get the Altera FPGA anymore. The alternatives didn't work, and the result was that the SM03 was discontinued and my order was canceled.
From this, I conclude that there are no remaining stocks and that they only produced after someone placed a order. The same applies to the new device. Anyone who has read his online diaries can then figure out the rest for themselves.

In that same LDdb thread, nidi posted images of the inside of the v2(?) blue unit internals. That Altera is not the only old chip that was used. I wonder where he even got some of those, as some are at least 15 years old. I'm disappointed by what I see there, and I now heavily doubt the SM03 would have ever worked well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogilein

My information should only serve to show that there are a few devices available to users, but no one should get their hopes up that there are dozens of devices in a warehouse that can be purchased, regardless of what anyone promises.
Some posts make it sound as if the SM03 is the Holy Grail that just needs to be found. That is not the case.

And I appreciate your input here.

Quote:

As far as I can see, none of the people who contacted Dan by email received a scam email.

That's good to know. I wonder why Barry was singled out? This whole situation was odd. But I've been online for 30+ years, BBS before it. In that time, the one thing I've never seen is an obvious scam/beg/request for money actually turn into a legit business proposition. Especially not when the account has some loose ties to apparent porn.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

But the way that is not the thread title started by me and I don’t appreciate being edited in that manner.

I edited the first post for you.

[Bogilein]

I have moved the posts and my reply to this post:

https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vid...tml#post104869

because it has nothing to do with the Singmai Scammers.

[BarryTheCrab]

For the record I asked if anyone else was contacted by this person in an attempt to determine if the individual was actually Dan’s wife. I never said the person was a scammer. I still think it was her mostly due to the photos sent to me.

[lordsmurf]

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

For the record I asked if anyone else was contacted by this person in an attempt to determine if the individual was actually Dan’s wife. I never said the person was a scammer. I still think it was her mostly due to the photos sent to me.

This is your post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

It’s a total hack job, similar to the Nigerian prince scam, fool me once…

And all of us agree with it.

Honestly, I think your age is showing. You want to believe, so you're disregarding the other facts.

Namely:
- dead people cannot have bank accounts
- the conversation started by begging for money
- clouds get hack too, so being sent photos means nothing

[BarryTheCrab]

On that one I was making light and be funny and I should not have. If it is his widow I wish I never brought this up.

[radiokom]

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryTheCrab

On that one I was making light and be funny and I should not have. If it is his widow I wish I never brought this up.

If it is his widow she is a scammer.

Because of scammers like that there are IBAN rules changed now:

https://www.erkiertmainka.com/insights/legal-change-for-bank-transfers-name-matching-with-iban-verification-of-payee