07-23-2003, 05:01 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Right now i'm redoing with Start-CQ=60 to give you more details about sample size etc.
|
CQ=60.00: Difference: 0.862563
CQ=51.75: Difference: 0.974991
CQ=51.75: Difference: 0.974991
...
m1v.Sample-filesize with 51.75-CQ: 2,392,064 Bytes
m1v-filesize with 51.75-CQ: 3,973,120 Bytes
Any idea
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 05:08 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@krassi,
I have the same problem starting with a CQ of 60.
Code:
CQMatic Versoin 1.0 Beta 1
Copyright Softronex Corporation, 2003
All rights reserved.
Ready!
Project: E:\Encodes\test.tpr
Creating CQMatic.tpr
E:\Encodes\test.m2v
Execute.
Movie Time: 98
Average Bitrate: 996
Executing Prediction Phase...
Using CQ of 60.00
Encoder started...
Encoder end.
Difference = 1.126464
Using CQ of 67.59
Encoder started...
Encoder end.
Difference = 1.030481
Using CQ of 67.59
Encoder started...
Encoder end.
Difference = 1.030481
Using CQ of 67.59
Encoder started...
Process canceled
I cancelled it in the end. I haven't tried by starting with a different base CQ, I'll do that now.
Fiz.
__________________
Fizzy Wizzy Lets get Bizzy!
|
07-23-2003, 08:38 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiz
I cancelled it in the end. I haven't tried by starting with a different base CQ, I'll do that now.
|
Got it working with another CQ at start
|
07-23-2003, 08:52 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm having the same problem as Krassi and Fiz where after 2 prediction samples, CQMatic keeps sampling at the same CQ! I find that if I cancel and restart with a CQ closer to the "stuck" value, that prediction completes as normal. Very weird bug.
|
07-23-2003, 08:58 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm having the same problem also with the resampling of the same cq after 2 tries.
David
|
07-23-2003, 10:37 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hey! Same problem with repeating CQ here too!
|
07-23-2003, 11:35 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Working on it ....
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 11:45 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Please download this: www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-test.exe
Try to use the same starting CQ that continued in a loop.
See if this fixes that.
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 11:55 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
See if this fixes that.
|
The behavior is different ![happy](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/biggrin.gif) . The second CQ was 55.88, third was 53.38.
|
07-23-2003, 12:21 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
See if this fixes that.
|
The behavior is different ![happy](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/biggrin.gif) . The second CQ was 55.88, third was 53.38.
|
Great ![happy](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/biggrin.gif)
sorry
The condition shouldn't repeat ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
I'm updating the regular cqmatic.exe to the same version as that test file now ( BETA 2 )
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 12:23 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm sorry to inform you that its still there. It only needed about 10 tries to find the same 51.75-value where it hangs. Sorry.
|
07-23-2003, 12:30 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
I'm sorry to inform you that its still there. It only needed about 10 tries to find the same 51.75-value where it hangs. Sorry. ![oops](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/redface.gif)
|
Thanks ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
Priority #1 to fix today
Stay tuned
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 01:30 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Here it is. www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-1.0b3.exe
Please try it again ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
I believe that if you start with the CQ that always continued to loop from the start, that's the actual CQ to encode, because it's within the precision boundaries. But ![doh!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/smack.gif) was running another iteration, instead of exiting at that point
I can't test it, because I haven't seen that condition in my encodes ![eek!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/eek.gif)
So please give us feedback
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 01:39 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I can't test it, because I haven't seen that condition in my encodes ![eek!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/eek.gif)
So please give us feedback ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
|
You bet
Doing a test right now. Second CQ is 57.24, third 55.86...56.18...final 56.18.
Have a beer, Kwag
Well, i have to double-check the new CQ. Its a bit higher than before (56.18 instead of 51.01). Maybe its more accurate now ![Cool](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/cool.gif) .
Thanks Kwag
|
07-23-2003, 02:01 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I can't test it, because I haven't seen that condition in my encodes ![eek!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/eek.gif)
So please give us feedback ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
|
You bet
Doing a test right now. Second CQ is 57.24, third 55.86...56.18...final 56.18.
Have a beer, Kwag
Well, i have to double-check the new CQ. Its a bit higher than before (56.18 instead of 51.01). Maybe its more accurate now ![Cool](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/cool.gif) .
Thanks Kwag ![woot!](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/woot.gif)
|
Thanks ![happy](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/biggrin.gif)
I'll post BETA 3 now ![smile](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/smile.gif)
I think that bug was totally squashed
-kwag
|
07-23-2003, 03:48 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I think that bug was totally squashed ![wink](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/wink.gif)
|
Thats also what i thougth. Man, this bug has a real big armor ![laugh](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/laugh2.gif) .
It was coming back when encoding a long movie (not the one i encoded previously ![devil](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/devil.gif) .
Maybe this has something to do with start-CQ of 60 or with PAL
EDIT: This time Difference in log doesn't stay at the same value with the same CQ, it varies a little bit.
|
07-23-2003, 04:06 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassi
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
I think that bug was totally squashed ![wink](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/wink.gif)
|
Thats also what i thougth. Man, this bug has a real big armor
|
Do this mean you are experiencing the problem again
With BETA 3
|
07-23-2003, 04:09 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Do this mean you are experiencing the problem again
With BETA 3 ![confused](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/main/question.gif)
|
Yep, exactly. With Beta 3 ![ridiculous](https://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif) .
|
07-23-2003, 04:37 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 06:43 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Is it normal that one prediction cycle is taking almost 20 minutes to complete? This with a 140 min. movie. It's going real slooooow....
Using the same script in ToK only takes 3-4 minutes on the first cycle.
This with a XP 2500 Barton. (Just upgraded)
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|